DOI of the article: |
10.1287/mnsc.2020.3887 |
Article title: |
Valuation of New Trademarks |
Overall assessment article's reproducibility (tables, figures, other results): |
Largely reproduced, with minor issues. |
Package includes a README file: |
Yes |
README file was sufficiently helpful to facilitate the reproduction: |
Yes |
Comment on the README file: |
README file and code were a little outdated: Table numbering not the same as published version. |
Replication package includes all the necessary DATA to reproduce the results reported in the main manuscript? |
Yes |
The missing data ... |
|
Data sources used in the study: |
USPTO Trademark data, CRSP, Compustat |
Comments on data availability: |
|
Was able to obtain all data needed to attempt a reproduction of all results: |
|
If applicable, any obstacles reviewer experienced to obtain complete dataset: |
|
Log files provided: |
No, log files are not provided within the replication package. |
Replication package includes necessary CODE to reproduce the results reported in the main manuscript? |
Yes. |
Which type of code is provided? |
SAS,Stata |
Other software: |
|
How many tables does the main manuscript contain overall? |
6 |
How many figures does the main manuscript contain overall? |
1 |
Table 1: |
Largely reproducible, with minor issues. |
Small negligible differences in number of firms for "None" |
Table 2: |
Largely reproducible, with minor issues. |
Small negligible differences in numbers. Code for top row of table not included in replication package. |
Table 3: |
Largely reproducible, with minor issues. |
Small negligible differences in numbers. Code for top row of table not included in replication package. |
Table 4: |
Largely reproducible, with minor issues. |
Small negligible differences in numbers. R2 and number of firms not reported through replication package. |
Table 5: |
Yes, fully reproducible. |
|
Table 6: |
Yes, fully reproducible. |
|